Search blog.co.uk

I've been out searching for the dolphins in the sea

by SeasideMan @ 23/04/08 - 10:23:47

dolphins

Helen and I saw dolphins last night as we were eating dinner (just after I took the above picture). Clearly visible through the window, there were up to 10 of them that kept appearing above the water and arcing back into it again. After a few minutes, they were gone again. They are truly lovely creatures and it made us happy to see them.

Thankfully there are no tuna round the waters of Britain, otherwise life might be more difficult for our dolphins. In the Pacific Ocean, there are both, and this has been a problem for decades now. By 1980, the dolphin population was a ¼ of what it was in 1960. Tuna and dolphins like each others company, so if you find dolphins in the pacific, you find tuna. The fishing method is to chase the dolphins in speedboats and when they get tired, put nets round them, catching both the dolphins and the tuna you really want at the same time.

The picture on this page shows the nets:

http://www.maninnature.com/Fisheries/Tuna/tuna1a.html

About 20 years ago, public annoyance at the declining dolphin population caused a change in the nets so that the dolphins could escape, but this has not helped the dolphin population to recover. It has made no difference: there are still only ¼ of the dolphins there were in 1960. One probable explanation for this is given here:

"Dolphin Numbers Still Low Despite "Safe" Tuna Fishing, Experts Say"

http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/03/070326-dolphins_2.html

“… the leading hypothesis is that [females] lose their babies during those chases

Researchers report that they have seen lactating mothers in the nets but so far no babies, indicating that the youngsters are left behind during the chase. If they can't reunite with their mothers, they most likely die”

If this is correct, it’s terrible. Much canned tuna now carries “dolphin safe” labelling to comfort consumers, but if the above hypothesis proves to be the right one, then this is a very false comfort. It’s put very bluntly here:

http://www.highnorth.no/Library/Interaction/Tuna_Dolphin/do-an-tu.htm

“The Dolphin Safe Label: In cooperation with environmental organisations, the major tuna canneries in the USA have introduced and marketed the Tuna Safe Label . The irony of it is that this label only serves to inform that the tuna has not been caught by encircling techniques. Dolphin Safe does not mean that no dolphins were killed. Data from fisheries in the Philippines, Sri Lanka and the Bay of Biscay, where other techniques are used, suggest that the number of dolphins killed per ton of tuna may be from 7 to 17 times higher in other fisheries than in those of the Eastern Tropical Pacific

Dolphin Safe = Environmentally Unsound The techniques that are now used in the Eastern Tropical Pacific lead to a much higher discard of immature tuna and incidental catches like sharks, sea turtles and several species of fish than when the tuna and accompanying dolphins were encircled. What it boils down to is, what are we willing to sacrifice for a dolphin? asks Martin Hall of the IATTC”

If you are a regular tuna eater, this gives something to think about.

To end on a happier note, here is a lovely performance of Tim Buckley singing Dolphins, from The Old Grey Whistle Test:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtU-9EMSYu0

“Sometimes I think about Saturday's child
And all about the times when we were running wild

I've been out searching for the dolphins in the sea

Ah, but sometimes I wonder, do you ever think of me
This old world will never change the way it's been
And all the ways of war won't change it back again

I've been out searchin' for the dolphin in the sea

Ah, but sometimes I wonder, do you ever think of me
This old world will never change”

Cheers, Tom.

Trackback address for this post:

authimage

Comments, Trackbacks: Hide subcomments

stewartacraigstewartacraig pro
23/04/08 @ 11:06

It's amazing that you can see a pod of Dolphins whilst having dinner! Such a shame about the tuna industry though... I don't even like tuna - awful stuff!

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
23/04/08 @ 13:39

Ah thanks, I didn't know "pod" was the correct word. Tuna is still very popular and I don't really know why. Even before I went vegetarian I never liked the stuff.

I'm so glad we moved to the coast - this is our 4th month here.

Cheers, Tom.

loiswakemanloiswakeman [Member]
http://lois.co.uk
23/04/08 @ 12:16

What a wonderful experience for you.

I still remember a magical day watching Minke whales fishing off Skye two years ago.

And I try not to eat tuna for the same reasons you give. It is so sad that they put labels on the tins to lull us into eating an unsustainable and ethically dubious product. Anyway, having seen tuna netting on TV a while ago, it is pretty barbaric in itself.

I don't think you can buy line-caught tinned tuna?

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
23/04/08 @ 13:43

Oh, I'd love to see the Minke whales. I don't think we get any of those here at all. We get porpoise too, and we did see a dead one on the beach when we first came here to look at the house we ended up buying. No whales though, as far as I know.

I agree about the labelling. It's a complete con, as was the netting to let dolphins out again. I'm sure there are many more examples of duplicitous behaviour of this sort by companies trying to sell us dubious products.

If line caught tuna is available, it will be much more expensive.

Cheers, Tom.

I hate damned tuna...it's the most overrated fish I know and they destroy dolphins as well, which would make them a no buy in any case on my shopping list...damn it...you should see what damage is done to coral reefs when the trawlers go out for Californian prawns!! They just drag their weighted nets over the reefs and destroy great stretches of it all for prawns off the coast in the USA....humans really are a plague on this planet...and really so very dim as well...doesn't it cross the minds of these people that the destruction of our wild life and our oceans is going to eventually destroy us?...Dove, Kitkat and Pringles are all buying palm oil from deforested areas of Indonesia, huge areas of forest and peat areas are being cleared to keep these companies supplied and that's going to cause major problems again eventually and is very destructive to the well being of the planet as more trees are lost....big hugs...damn this is depressing!

SeasideManSeasideMan pro
23/04/08 @ 13:48

I agree with you, we humans really are a plague on this planet. What we don't consume we seem to destroy, rather like maggots in a rotting carcass. I didn't know about the coral damage caused by prawn fishing, but I'm not at all surprised.

Palm oil is another hot issue at the moment, and I admit I do buy peanutbutter that contains it sometimes. I try and buy wholefood stuff that doesn't contain it most of the time, but sometimes I do slip. I must try harder.

I'm sorry for the depressing blog, but I like to throw a serious issue in at least once a week.

Cheers, Tom.

Leave a comment :

Your email address will not be displayed on this site.
Your URL will be displayed.
Allowed XHTML tags: <!, p, ul, ol, li, dl, dt, dd, address, blockquote, ins, del, a, span, bdo, br, em, strong, dfn, code, samp, kdb, var, cite, abbr, acronym, q, sub, sup, tt, i, b, big, small, img>
URLs, email, AIM and ICQs will be converted automatically.
Options:
 
(Line breaks become <br />)
(Set cookies for name, email & url)
Validation code:
Please enter the above code here:
For protection from spambots (case-sensitive).